Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulators of biglycan in cardiac fibroblasts.

Basic Res Cardiol. 2009 Aug 23; Tiede K, Melchior-Becker A, Fischer JWBiglycan, a small leucine-rich proteoglycan, is essential for scar formation and preservation of hemodynamic function after myocardial infarction, as shown in biglycan-knockout mice. Because of this important role in cardiac pathophysiology, we aimed to identify regulators of biglycan expression and posttranslational modifications in cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiac fibroblasts were isolated from neonatal Wistar-Kyoto rats and used in the first passage. Expression of biglycan was analyzed after metabolic labeling with [(35)S]-sulfate by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and molecular sieve chromatography; mRNA expression was examined by Northern analysis and real-time RT-PCR. Serum, thrombin, transforming growth factor beta1 (TGFbeta 1) and platelet-derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB) strongly increased [(35)S]-labeled proteoglycan levels. Tumor necrosis factor alpha further increased the stimulatory effect of PDGF-BB. PDGF-BB increased glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chain length as shown by molecular sieve chromatography after beta-elimination to release GAG chains. Nitric oxide was the only negative regulator of biglycan as evidenced by marked downregulation in response to DETA-NO ((Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl)amino]diazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate), a long acting nitric oxide donor and SNAP (S-nitroso-N-acetyl-l,l-penicillamine), which completely inhibited PDGF-BB-induced secretion of total [(35)S]-labeled proteoglycans and biglycan mRNA expression. Of note, the molecular weight of biglycan GAG chains was even further increased by NO donors compared to control and PDGF-BB stimulation. The current results suggest that in cardiac fibroblasts, biglycan is induced by a variety of stimuli including serum, thrombin and growth factors such as PDGF-BB and TGFbeta1. This response is counteracted by NO and enhanced by TNFalpha. Interestingly, both up- and downregulation were associated with posttranslational increase of GAG chain length.

The clavicle hook plate for Neer type II lateral clavicle fractures.

J Orthop Trauma. 2009 Sep; 23(8): 570-4Renger RJ, Roukema GR, Reurings JC, Raams PM, Font J, Verleisdonk EJOBJECTIVE: To evaluate functional and radiologic outcome in patients with a Neer type II lateral clavicle fracture treated with the clavicle hook plate. DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study. SETTING: Five level I and II trauma centers. PATIENTS: Forty-four patients, average age 38.4 years (18-66 years), with a Neer type II lateral clavicle fracture treated with the clavicle hook plate between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2006. INTERVENTION: Open reduction and internal fixation with the clavicle hook plate. Removal of all 44 implants after consolidation at a mean of 8.4 months (2-33 months) postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: At an average follow-up of 27.4 months (13-48 months), functional outcome was assessed with the Constant-Murley scoring system. Radiographs were taken to evaluate consolidation and to determine the distance between the coracoid process and the clavicle. RESULTS: The average Constant score was 92.4 (74-100). The average distance between the coracoid process and the clavicle was 9.8 mm (7.3-14.8 mm) compared with 9.4 mm (6.9-14.3 mm) on the contralateral nonoperative side. We observed 1 dislocation of an implant (2.2%), 2 cases of pseudarthrosis (4.5%), 2 superficial wound infections (4.5%), 2 patients with hypertrophic scar tissue (4.5%), and 3 times an acromial osteolysis (6.8%). Thirty patients (68%) reported discomfort due to the implant. These implant-related complaints and the acromial osteolysis disappeared after removal of the hook plate. With all the patients, direct functional aftercare was possible. CONCLUSIONS: The clavicle hook plate is a suitable implant for Neer type II clavicle fractures. The advantage of this osteosynthesis is the possibility of immediate functional aftercare. We observed a high percentage of discomfort due to the implant; therefore, we advise to remove the implant as soon as consolidation has taken place.