Development of a sequence-characterized amplified region marker for diagnosis of dwarf bunt of wheat and detection of Tilletia controversa Kühn.

Lett Appl Microbiol. 2009 May 27; Liu JH, Gao L, Liu TG, Chen WQAbstract Aims: Dwarf bunt of wheat, caused by Tilletia controversa Kühn, is a destructive disease on wheat as well as an important international quarantined disease in many countries. The objective of this investigation was to develop a diagnostic molecular marker generated from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) for rapid identification of T. controversa. Methods and Results: A total of 30 primer combinations were tested by AFLP to detect DNA polymorphisms between T. controversa and related species. The primer combination E08/M02 generated a polymorphic pattern displaying a 451-bp DNA fragment specific for T. controversa. The marker was converted into a sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR), and specific primers (SC-01(49)/SC-02(415)), designed for use in PCR detection assays, amplified a unique DNA fragment in all isolates of T. controversa, but not in the related pathogens. The detection limit with the primer set SC-01(49)/SC-02(415) was 10 ng of DNA which could be obtained from 11 mug of teliospores in a 25-mul PCR reaction. Conclusions: An approach to distinguish T. controversa from similar pathogenic fungi has been developed based on the use of a SCAR marker. Significance and Impact of the Study: Development of the simple, high throughput assay kit for the rapid diagnosis of dwarf bunt of wheat and detection of T. controversa is anticipated in further studies.

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery 2009: what is the future for the gastroenterologist?

Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2009 May 26; Abbas Fehmi SM, Kochman MLPURPOSE OF REVIEW: In order to predict whether the gastroenterologist will have a role in the rapidly developing field of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES), it is helpful to examine the new developments in this field. Our goal in this review is to examine the recent developments in the field and study the gastroenterologists' role to best make this prediction. RECENT FINDINGS: Perhaps the most significant development in the field of NOTES has been the favorable patient and physician preferences for NOTES. There is evidence that patients would prefer NOTES cholecystectomy to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The most common reason for this choice appears to be the lack of pain and visible scar. Another very significant development has been the reality of human NOTES procedures. Multiple centers have reported human NOTES procedures, including transgastric appendectomies, transgastric liver biopsies, transgastric tubal ligation and transvaginal cholecystectomy without major complications. Gastroenterologists' expertise with flexible endoscope was critical in the above cases. Recently, a few publications have also shown how gastroenterologists with expertise in endosonography can have a role in affirming safe access. SUMMARY: Although no one can predict with certainty where the field of NOTES will be in 1 year, it seems likely that gastroenterologist involvement will be necessary and advancements in this field will be applicable and diffuse into our daily practice.

Primary umbilical endometriosis: a rare variant of extragenital endometriosis.

Pathologica. 2008 Dec; 100(6): 473-5Khaled A, Hammami H, Fazaa B, Zermani R, Ben Jilani S, Kamoun MREndometriosis is defined as the presence of extra-uterine endometrial tissue. The prevalence rate of umbilical endometriosis ranges from 0.5 to 1.0% of all patients with extragenital endometriosis. In this report, we present a case of primary umbilical endometriosis to highlight the challenges encountered during diagnosis. A nulliparous 39-year-old woman presented to our department with a 2-year history of a tender, painful and non-reducible, firm umbilical mass that enlarged slowly reaching 2 cm in diameter. She had never been pregnant nor had any abdominal surgery. There was no sequential bleeding. Ultrasound of the umbilical region showed a well defined, oval shaped anechoic area. Histological examination on a cutaneous biopsy concluded umbilical endometriosis. The patient was subsequently referred to a gynecologist and underwent surgery with en bloc excision of the lesion. Generally, umbilical endometriosis presents as a roundish tumuor that can either partly or completely occupy the umbilical scar with intermittent bleeding. Characteristically, the mass increases with the menstrual cycle, becoming more evident and usually harder and is associated with cyclic pain. Its pathogenesis remains uncertain. Clinical diagnosis is difficult, and umbilical endometriosis can be easily confused with other conditions such as benign and malignant tumours. Ultrasound examination is useful, and surgical excision is the treatment of choice. Several cases of malignant transformation have also been described.